[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[pronut-hiv] Why women should NOT use Lemon or Lime Juice as a microbicide
- From: "ProNut-HIV" <pronut-hiv@healthnet.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:32:16 -0400
[PMTCTforum] Why women should NOT use Lemon or Lime Juice as a
microbicide
Some people say that women can use lime or lemon juice to protect
themselves from HIV. Is that true?
No. Women in many cultures have used lemon or
lime juice for contraception and vaginal hygiene
purposes for centuries. Studies in Nigeria and
elsewhere show that some women also believe that
lemon
and lime juice might help protect them from HIV
infection. New research findings, however,
demonstrate
that rather than helping, these juices can
cause damage that could make it easier for HIV to
enter the
body. Washing out the vagina with either 100%
or diluted lime or lemon juice may increase a
woman's
risk of getting infected with HIV if her
partner is HIV positive.
What research shows that lime or lemon juice in the vagina could
increase HIV risk?
Three studies have shown this.
Dr. Christine Mauck of CONRAD did a study
enrolling 48 sexually abstinent women volunteers. She
divided the women into four groups: those using
100% lime juice ("neat" juice with no water), 50%
(half
water, half juice), 25% (one part water, three
parts juice) and one group using plain water.
Each group
inserted their assigned test fluid twice daily
for six consecutive days during two menstrual
cycles. In one
cycle, it was inserted via a douche and, in the
other, via a modified tampon soaked in lime
juice.
All the women were carefully checked for
vaginal infections, irritation and other problems
before and
after the study and were treated for any
problems they had. The result showed that some women
got small
but serious abrasions (injuries) in the walls
of their vaginas after using 50% and 100% lime
juice. The
women who used 25% juice or plain water didn't
get these abrasions. So the juice had a
dose-dependent
effect - meaning the likelihood of damage
increases as the concentration of juice increases.
Among the
women using 100% lime juice with no water, more
than 65% experienced genital irritation, 50%
experienced deep epithelial abrasions and more
than 70% reported experiencing pain.
Carol Lackman-Smith of the Southern Research
Institute did a laboratory study comparing the
cytotoxicity (cell-damaging effect) and
anti-HIV activity of lemon and lime juice to that of the
spermicide
nonoxynol-9 (N-9). She tested these three
substances on cervical explant tissue (human cells
obtained from routine hysterectomies and kept alive
in lab cultures) to find out what impact they
might have on the
same kinds of cells in the human body. She
found the amount of cell damage caused by lemon and
lime
juice was similar to the damage caused by N-9,
a product dropped from consideration as a
microbicide in
2000 when it was shown capable of increasing
women's vulnerability to HIV infection if used
frequently.
Lackman-Smith also looked at how much lemon or
lime juice was needed to stop HIV and found that
it
was the same concentration (50% or greater)
that also caused cell damage. She concluded that,
when the
juice is diluted to a point where no cell
damage occurred, it also had little or no effect on
HIV.
Robin Shattock (at St. George's Hospital,
London) and Gustavo Doncel (CONRAD) also did lab
studies
on lemon and lime juice. Dr. Shattock showed
that lime juice inactivates HIV more effectively
than lemon
juice. He also showed that a 25% concentration
of lime juice could cause cell damage in tissue
samples
from the penis. Dr. Doncel showed that even a
25% concentration could damage vaginal cells. Both
found that, to inactivate HIV in semen, one had
to expose it to a 50% concentration of lime juice
for 30
minutes.
So what does all this research mean?
This research suggests that, in real life use
(in the vagina along with semen), a 50%
concentration of lime
juice is needed to stop HIV. BUT a
concentration of 50% or higher is also likely to cause damage
to the
vagina - and possibly the penis. This damage
could make it easier for HIV infection to occur.
Therefore, as the Economist magazine wrote on
29 April, 2006, "as a microbicide, lime juice is
safe
when it is ineffective and effective when it is
unsafe."
What messages should we be giving to women about lime and lemon juice?
Using lime or lemon juice to try to protect
against HIV is risky, and may actually increase a
woman's risk
of becoming infected. Scientific studies show
that lime and lemon juice do not meet the
standards of
safety and effectiveness (clinical trials) that
must be required of any microbicide.
Even though they are natural substances and
readily available in many places, they are more
likely to
increase a woman's risk of becoming infected
than to decrease it. We must caution women against
using
these juices just as we now caution them
against using N-9 for HIV prevention - because it
doesn't work.
Are "natural" microbicides even possible?
Dozens of other candidate microbicides are
currently in the research pipeline, including several
derived
from "natural substances" such seaweed or the
oil of the Indian Neem Tree. But all potential
microbicides-whether derived from naturally
occurring substances or manufactured ones-have to go
through a rigorous testing process to find out
whether they are safe for women to use and
whether they
work. One of these is Carraguard, a product
made from the seaweed gel carrageenan. It has been
proven
to be safe for vaginal use and is now in
large-scale effectiveness trials in South Africa to see
if it reduces
HIV transmission.
Just because something is natural doesn't mean
it is safe. It is not advisable to use an
available, natural
product in the hope that it may protect you or
because someone tells you that it works. If it
turns out to be
unsafe - as lime and lemon juice have - using
it could actually increase your risk of getting
HIV.
When will the first proven microbicides become available?
More than two-dozen product leads are now being
tested to see which are safe and effective for
regular
use. Five of these are in large-scale
effectiveness trials to see if they actually reduce HIV
risk when used.
If one of the five is effective, a microbicide
could be ready for distribution in a handful of
countries by the
end of 2010.(1)
If none of them work, we will continue to wait
as the next wave of candidates, those now being
tested for
safety, goes through effectiveness testing.
While this research is going on, the microbicide
community is
working hard to accelerate development and
ensure that a safe, effective product - once proven -
gets into
the hands of all who need it as quickly as
possible.
Global Campaign for Microbicides. June 2006.
Reproduction encouraged.
For info contact: info@global-campaign.org
Updates available at:
www.global-campaign.org/download.htm
(1) Results from the trials furthest along could
become available in late 2007 or 2008, but it
will take additional time for the products to be
reviewed and approved for licensure.
|