ProNUTRITION

Photo by Iain McLellan for AED, FANTA Project  

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [pronut-hiv] Nutrition Care and support for PLWHA and OVCs:Countries'experiences (2)


  • From: "francis khadudu" <fkwere@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 23:28:11 -0700 (PDT)

Dear Members of the pronut,

Indeed we find the technical reports and views of the very enriching on this critical issue of economic empowerment of both the infected and affected persons, I  humbly suggest that we come up with appropriate and cost effective interventions for the resource poor small scale farmers in Sub Saharan Africa who are currently the most affected.

How about inviting some project proposals from members for consideration    for support by interested  partners?

Regards

Francis Were

--- Quick, Timothy C (GH/OHA/TLR) wrote:

Grace -- PEPFAR would like to see expanded support from the Global Fund
for AIDS, TB, and Malaria (GFATM), the Government of Kenya (GOK) and
other partners so that Food by Prescription clinical services are
universally provided to malnourished PLWHA, as well as
pregnant/lactating women in PMTCT programs and their infants and young
children.

These therapeutic, supplementary and supplemental foods are
provided for a limited period of time to correct malnutrition
(underweight) or to protect those who are nutritionally vulnerable in
pregnancy/lactation and early childhood. This support is distinguished
from the need of these individuals and their families to have the
capacity to meet their longer-term needs for an adequate diet. That, as
you suggest, will need additional support to strengthen their capacity
to address their own needs through food security and livelihoods
programs.



Tim Quick, Ph.D., M.S.

Senior Technical Advisor for HIV & Nutrition

Co-Chair, PEPFAR Food & Nutrition Technical Working Group

USAID Office of HIV/AIDS

1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20523-51020

1-202-712-0974 (office)

1-202-216-3015 (fax)

1-301-275-6652 (cell)

tquick@usaid.gov





-----Grace Ettyang:



Hi Everyone ,



Just a thought. What sample size will 250 facilities cover?. What about

those with no access to INSTA? Is anyone thinking/interested

in developing sustainable *home based* therapeutic foods that could be

linked to family/community livelihoods?.



Grace

-

Grace A. Keverenge-Ettyang (PhD)

Dept. of Epidemiology and Nutrition

School of Public Health

Moi University

P O Box 4606

ELDORET 30100

Kenya

Cell: +254-722-609257





------ Tadayo Hanna wrote:



> Hi Everyone

>

> Thanks John for sharing the experiences from Kisumu Kenya.

> Initially, the USAID /INSTA support was being carried out on a pilot
basis

> in 63 facilities through out kenya from 2006.

>

> I wish to let the team know that due to the successful outcomes from
the

> pilot phase, USAID has awarded the program another 5 years upto 2013
and to

> scale up to 250 facilities . This will be implemented by the
USAID/Nutrition

> HIV Program in collaboration with NASCOP. (INSTA and AED) through
private

> public partneship will continue with the support for the vulnerable
groups

> incliding Pregnant and Post Partum clients, malnourished PLHIV with
BMI

> less than 18.5, children above 6months as well as the OVCs.

>

> The program will also enhance the health facility - community
linkages.

> The Program was officially launched on 15th August 2008 during the
National

> Nutrition Day by the Ministry of Medical Services - Kenya and USAID
with

> support from NASCOP and other stakeholders( UNICEF, WHO etc).

>

> To note about the program is the point of use water treatment
provision for

> the beneficiaries and supplements from 6 months and over. This means
that

> none of the food products are recomended for children below six months
as

> per the set guidelines. The water treatment not only supports those
who use

> ERF as a feeding option but also support clean safe water for all
epecially

> PLHIV and the vulnerable. This will reduce water borne illnesses!

>

> All stakeholders need to join hands to support policies and guidelines

> towards better health of the population.

>

> Below is a segment of the message from one of the Government of Kenya

> officials - Ministry of medical Services as quoted in one the
Kenyan

> Newspapers newspapers on the day of the launch. The theme was "
Nutrition is

> essential for Management of HIV"

>

> "Key components of this program include capacity building of health
care

> providers, provision of therapeutic and supplemental food to treat

> malnourished PLHWA and OVCs. The supplemental food is in the form of

> nutrient-dense fortified blended foods and the first locally produced
and

> distributed Ready-to-Use-Therapeutic Food (RUTF). This program will
support

> scaling up of operations from the current 63 health facilities to 250
health

> facilities by 2013.

>

> NASCOP will partner with the Academy for Educational Development (an

> International non profit development organization) and Insta Products

> Limited (a Kenyan -owned food manufacturing company). These
organizations

> will partner in the scale-up. "

>

>

> HANNA C. TADAYO

> USAID/Nutrition and HIV Program (NHP)

> Academy for Educational Development (AED)

> htadayo@aed.org

>

> --- Okanda, John wrote:

>

> Hi everyone,

> Thanks Hanna for answering Bill's question on thoughts about ways that

> malnourishment among mothers enrolled in PMTCT is being remedied.

>

> I want to add that in Kisumu-Kenya, USAID/INSTA PRODUCTS provides food

> supplements and waterguard for HIV positive pregnant mothers
throughout

> pregnancy and for the first 6 months postpartum. They also provide
weaning

> supplements for babies from 6 months through to 2 years.

>

> In our PMTCT study, we have seen reduction in the number of mothers

> complaining

> of insufficient production of milk due to lack of food, reduction in
mix

> feeding

> cases and increase in number of mothers complying with cessation of

> breastfeeding at 6 months.

>

> Waterguard (dilute, locally-produced sodium hypochlorite solution) is
used

> for

> water treatment in the homes. This has helped mothers and kids to have

> clean and

> safe drinking water. We have seen a reduction in Diarrhea morbidity in
our

> study.

>

> The supplements are also provided for Orphans or Vulnerable Children
(OVC)

> and

> malnourished PLWHAs. Thanks to USAID/INSTA.

>

> John Okanda

> Nutritionist,

> CDC/KEMRI,

> HIV-Research,

> Kisumu, Kenya.

>

>

> -----Tadayo Hanna wrote:

>

> Hi All,

>

> Thanks you Bill and Dorcas for highlighting some very important
issues.

>

> To respond to Bill's question on what is being done for malnourished

> pregnant and lactating women, in Kenya, some programs are actually

> providing

> supplemental food to the PMTCT pregnant women and upto 6 months post

> partum.

>

> However, from field assessments in response to Dorca's concern and

> suggestion for expressing BM by mothers to continue EBF when they
return

> back

> to work before 6 months are over, some mothers mentioned that they do
not

> get

> adequate support from care givers who are left to take care of their

> infants.

> Afew mentioned that some care givers do not like to "deal with human

> milk" hence the challenge for some to continue EBF through expressing
BM.

>

> Pre -service training and in -service training is going on in other
places

> but

> the question still remains " does this knowledge translate into

> practise?"

>

> It is indeed important to utilize all approaches whether through care

> givers at

> health facilities as well as the community linkages to advocate for
optimal

> nutritional practices for all especially the vulnerable, malnourished
and

> PLHIV.

>

>

> HANNA C. TADAYO

> USAID/Nutrition and HIV Program (NHP)

> Academy for Educational Development (AED)- Kenya

>

> ---William F Wulsin wrote:

>

> This discussion forum is most remarkable!

>

> Dorcas, Hanna and Kate have brought us full circle in recognizing that
a

> comprehensive approach that strengthens, integrates and systematizes
each

> of

> the

> components of PMTCT will likely improve outcomes with a more tightly
woven

> net

> of support for mothers. Consistent access to health services, clean
water,

> usable information, reliable counseling, community, family and
workplace

> support and access to nutritious food ALL are needed for

> effective/optimal ERF and EBF.

>

> Sounds similar to the familiar refrain

> that we know too well calling out the need for widespread and

> equitable access to primary health related care. Hopefully this

> dialogue can bolster each of our individual efforts to improve PMTCT

> components while not losing site of their contribution to the whole.

>

> I often wonder if one issue might underly the effectiveness for each

> of the others when addressing HIV prevention and care. The issue that

> comes to mind is systemic population wide malnutrition. It is

> difficult to conceive of any element of PMTCT (or HIV care!) that is

> not seriously impeded by chronic malnutrition. I do not mean to imply

> that we must emphasize relieving hunger at the expense of individual

> programs. Perhaps though, our efforts to improve those PMTCT

> component programs such as counseling, education, consistent messages,

> access to care, transportation, product development and delivery,

> clean water etc. will be strengthened by linking them with programs

> that promote sustained access to nutritious food. With persistent

> malnutrition our PMTCT and related infectious disease prevention

> efforts might be likened to attempting to fill a bucket riddled with

> holes.

>

> Any thoughts about ways that malnourishment among mothers enrolled in

> PMTCT is being remedied?

>

> Best regards,

>

> Bill

>

> William F. Wulsin, ND, MA, MPH

> 753 North 35th Street

> Suite 302

> Seattle Washington, 98103, USA

>

> 206 283-9139 FAX

> 206 679 8500 cell

> skype: drbillwulsin

>

> wfwulsin@u.washington.edu

>

> -- Dorcas Lwanga wrote:

>

> > Thank you Hanna

> > You bring up some very critical points.

> >

> > At a recent regional training on Essential Nutrition Actions in the

> > Southern African region, we visited a few hospitals and had a chance

> > to

> > talk to and counsel HIV positive mothers who were bringing their

> > infants

> > for a well baby visit. A number of mothers indicated that the reason

> > they were not able to EBF is because they had to go back to work and

> > where not sure how they could continue to EBF the baby. One solution

> > is

> > to express the breast milk but this message was received with some

> > hesitation.

> >

> > At the same training it was made very clear to us that the best

> > option

> > is and remains EBF. Most of the clients we saw did not meet AFASS
for

> > ERF. Nonetheless we did observe that the messages given whilst the

> > mother was attending antenatal visits and also during postnatal were

> > well received and in line with WHO guidelines, however, a number of

> > the

> > mothers we saw were very young and it was obvious that even though

> > they

> > had made the decision to EBF and could explain the benefits of EBF
and

> > what it mean't, what happened at home was different because they

> > had no

> > bargaining power in the home on the feeding of the baby...hence
there

> > was a lot of mixed feeding happening. One nurse did voice a concern

> > she

> > had over the number of infants that were dying.She attributed it to

> > mixed feeding despite the counselling provided.

> >

> > Reaching out to the community is very very critical step in making
BF

> > safe. Commitment to strengthen community involvement and support for

> > BF

> > is necessary to making BF safe.

> >

> > I do agree that we have to figure out how to advocate for increased

> > maternity leave as one of the solutions to help increase EBF for all

> > women. In line with this there needs to be more emphasis on training

> > health workers to counsel, train and support mothers, especially
those

> > that have to return to work prior to 6 months, on how to express
their

> > breast milk if that is an option, so that someone else can feed the

> > baby

> > and in that way ensure that EBF is maintained.

> >

> > In changing the attitude of the health care provider and counsellors

> > and ensuring that the messages used are clear, there has to be a

> > greater emphasis on Pre-service training on BF and replacement

> > feeding.

> > A lot of training on BF is done in in-service programs which is
okay

> > but you are working to change an attitude that has been established

> > for

> > a while. Having a cadre of health workers coming out of training

> > institutions with the know how I believe will produce a much better

> > outcome.

> >

> > Furthermore, the training on Breast feeding and Replacement

> > feeding should be done at all levels/stages of the program and not

> > concentrated in the first, second, third or final year of study.
Each

> > year should build on to the next. It maybe time to take a good look
at

> > the training curricula at all levels/years of training for all the

> > different health cadre to ensure that the correct information and

> > messages on BF and replacement feeding are taught.

> >

> > cheers

> >

> > Dorcas

> >

> > Dorcas Lwanga MSc., RD

> > Nutritionist

> > Africa's Health in 2010 Project

> > Academy for Educational Development

> > 1825 Connecticut Ave. NW

> > Washington, DC 20009-5721 USA

> > Tel. (202) 884-8815

> > Fax. (202) 884-8447

> > When there's nothing left but God, that's when you know that
God

> is

> > all

> > you need. Unknown

> > " Where love is there God is also" Mahtma Gandhi

> >

> >

> >

> >>>> "Tadayo Hanna" wrote:

> >

> > Dear All,

> >

> > EBF has always been and will always be the best option for feeding

> > infants because as we all know most of our clients in resource

> > challenged settings do not meet AFASS for ERF.

> >

> > How to strengthen EBF is by first changing the attitute of health
Care

> > Providers and counsellors who despite knowing EBF as the Gold

> > Standard

> > continue to recommend RF.

> >

> > Governments /programs and all stakeholders need to seriously
consider

> > the type of counseling and training being passed on so that clear

> > messages reach the mothers/clients.

> >

> > Committment to strengthen Reproductive health training and

> > intergrate Infant feeding counseling at all levels of care ( FP

> > clinics,

> > MCH, PMTCT , CCC,Support groups etc) will go a long way in creating

> > awareness and supporting all clients epecially those on ARVS to
make

> > the proper choices for feeding their infants.

> >

> > Increasing maternity leave to accommodate all women to practice EBF

> > for

> > 6 months will also help as well as providing clients on ARVS with

> > adequate knowledge and support for them to make informed decisions/

> > choices on how to feed their infants as per the set policies and

> > guidelines.

> >

> > Stigma continues to affect most of our clients who opt for ERF due
to

> > cultural and other social related isues hence some clients
practicing

> > mixed feeding.

> >

> > Disclosure and adherence counseling need to be strengthened and be

> > made part and parcel of "compehensive management of HIV"

> >

> >

> > Hanna

> >

> >

> >

> > HANNA C. TADAYO

> > USAID/Nutrition and HIV Program (NHP)-Kenya

> > Academy for Educational Development( AED)

> >

> > --- Jean Tshiula wrote:

> >

> > Dear all,

> >

> > WHO recommendations 2006 say:

> >

> > "Feeding option for an HIV-infected mother depends on her
individual

> > circumstances and local situation

> >

> > EBF is recommended for the first 6 months of life unless replacement

> > feeding is

> > AFASS

> >

> > When replacement feeding is AFASS avoidance of all breastfeeding by

> > HIV-infected mothers is recommended

> >

> > At 6 months if replacement feeding is still not AFASS continuation
of

> >

> > breastfeeding with additional complementary foods is recommended

> >

> > All HIV-infected mothers should receive counselling which includes

> > provision of

> > general information about risks and benefits of feeding options"

> >

> > It means that the first option is EBF unless if replacement feeding
is

> >

> > AFASS! Therefore, the question will be how do we make BF safe.

> >

> > Jean Tshiula (AED/CAP SA)

> >

> >

> > -----

> >

> >> Dear Toumzghi,

> >>

> >> Do not feel guilty for your concern/question. You, like many
workers

> > in

> >> the

> >> field, have a very relevant concern: "How do we make
exclusive

> > replacement

> >> feeding (ERF)--which is actually only infant formula--safe?"
In

> > fact,

> >> according to the spirit of the WHO recommendation, the first
option

> > is

> >> "replacement feeds=infant formula" unless the mother
(and

> her

> > family)

> >> cannot

> >> meet AFASS conditions, then exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) (until
when

> >

> >> AFASS

> >> conditions are met). At all cost you and I would go for
replacement

> >> feeding--since we could easily meet AFASS conditions with the
right

> >> support.

> >>

> >> But what Silvia is saying is that "with the levels of
poverty and

> > cultural

> >> environment in most of our countries, AFASS conditions are almost

> >> impossible

> >> for the majority of our clients" ...........Note also that
EBF

> for 6

> >

> >> months

> >> has never been the easier option for the mother. It is difficult
for

> > most

> >> of

> >> our clients (mixed feeding is the easier option). BUT EBF is the

> > safest

> >> option when you actually start to think about a baby born to a
HIV+

> > woman.

> >>

> >> Maybe we need to segment clients to those a) among whom we
support
to

> > make

> >> EBF safer and possible, and b) among whom we support to make ERF

> > safer and

> >> possible. We have done a lot on making EBF safe BUT very little
in

> > sought

> >> for ways to support families meet the AFASS conditions: Clean
water?

> >> Sanitation/hygiene education? Free formula? Family planning? Or
is

> > it

> >> through other innovation(s) we have not as yet identified?

> >>

> >>

> >> Robert Mwadime (FANTA)

> >

> >>

> >> -----Toumzghi sengal

> >>

> >> May be I was too concerned about the children ( to consider it a

> > crime) to

> >> go through the process of getting infected after birth. And 3 to
4

> > years

> >> down the road we tell the care givers how the child got it. Any
body

> > ready

> >> to sue??? will they understand the logic why it seems the
easiest

> >> solution

> >> to take the breastfeeding route.

> >>

> >> Toumzghi

> >>

> >> ------Sylvia magezi wrote:

> >>>

> >>> Dear Readers,

> >>>

> >>> I think it is easy to think breastfeeding an HIV positive
baby a

> > crime,

> >>> if

> >>> you have not seen mothers struggling not to breastfeed a

> > malnourished

> >> infant

> >>> and giving the baby diluted milk that does not adequately
give the

> > infant

> >>> the nourishment she needs.

> >>>

> >>> I once studied feeding characteristics of infants in a PMTCT
ward

> > in

> >>> Kampala and saw several mothers that had decided not to
breastfeed

> > but

> >> could

> >>> not afford infant formula and their infants were
malnourished. I

> >>> wondered

> >>> what kind of future they had. The mothers were very stressed

> > trying

> > to

> >> feed

> >>> them and the babies either rejected the milk or had stomach

> upsets.

> >

> > The

> >>> reality is people are very poor, cannot afford infant formula
yet

> > they

> >> still

> >>> give birth. They are forced to have children for reasons you

> > cannot

> >>> control, the men believe that with anti retroviral therapy
they

> > should

> >>> continue having children and mothers have to comply.
Sanitation in

> > many

> >>> places is poor and the numbers dying of diarrhoea are very
high.

> > So

> >> health

> >>> workers are forced to make those decisions. What would you

> > recommend

> > in

> >> such

> >>> a scenario?

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Sylvia Magezi

> >

>

>

>

>







-